CO129-606-2 Treasury control over Hong Kong finances 22-1-1948 - 9-12-1948 — Page 15

points in writing.

I see no difficulty about the

second. What about the first? Y

Referance last paragraph of (24)

,

Mr. Bancroft is correct in thinking that there was a typing error in (23).

I have corrected it.

16.9.48.

M2 Chaplin

that repercussions

agres

Malaya

need

not he

Cenordered

އވ

one have already asked Malaya for

ther proposals for 545. contral and

indicated that

well agil

have

That-

no

reference to Sofs regarding cantes. off" well

be required.

There

contention that objections

Treasury

raised

de volution

agree

come point

12

could

the

15 introducing

one part of the

propiais be

Before H.K. Kas

Kadam

of commenting

opportunity

15-

the proposals generally.

IK Kinnever presents special features,

in that inevitably the

iams requiring

member

Is be written

станит

To the

normat

greater Kan

Hermath of the

Conce wenty

f

Ke

involved

under

the recupation; and

amami

the existing system

would be out of proportion

7 corresponding.

16 any

result rebroved by

referring

home

то

away

аг

for

as Rossette

Mittag to the Says..

with such larging

and

to remove

control from Whittall

Civ frit less correspondance

the unpopnése

A

helly justifies to

my mind, anticipating this me aspect of

devolution picture? emer

1819

the suppor